PDA

View Full Version : There Are No Barbarians At the Gates


MikeKAY
04-27-2005, 02:52 PM
I just discovered this today on a different forum, I appreciated it so I figured I would post it here.

Great read.
______________________________
"Like every other creature on the face of the earth, Godfrey was, by birthright, a stupendous badass, albeit in the somewhat narrow technical sense that he could trace his ancestry back up a long line of slightly less highly evolved stupendous badasses to that first self-replicating gizmo - which, given the number and variety of its descendants, might justifiably be described as the most stupendous badass of all time. Everyone and everything that wasn't a stupendous badass was dead."
--Neal Stephenson, Cryptonomicon

"Necessity is the excuse for every infringement of human liberty. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."
--William Pitt

They ask us why. Why do we need guns? In a country among the most civilized and safe the world has ever seen, why does a person need a device designed solely for the purpose of taking life? Then they tell us about the needs they want to meet. The need to protect children from harm. The need to stop the streets from being killing fields. The need for the average citizen to be safe when he walks out his front door.

So let's talk about needs.

Throughout human history, the same tale is told over, and over, and over again. A mighty civilization rises, a shining beacon of culture and science and architecture and art. It lasts for generations, for centuries. And then the barbarians arrive. They see no value in running water, in the written word, in waste disposal, in magnificent buildings. They come to plunder and burn, to rape and kill, and this mighty civilization is laid to waste. The barbarians, you see, may not be able to read, and they may not know how to build an aqueduct, and they may not have any use for the elderly or infirm, but they do know how to kill. They understand that, in the final analysis, might does make right. Enough people with enough axes can ignore whatever laws, rules, or ethics might stop a lesser force.

Barbarism, it seems, is the natural human condition. If history itself isn't convincing enough, look at the world today. There's rioting in the streets of Los Angeles - what's guaranteed? Looting. They can't stop us, we'll take everything we can get our hands on. A tsunami slams into the shores of South Asia, with a resulting death toll of hundreds of thousands. What happens in the aftermath? European slavers snatch up lost little girls to sell to the depraved. Surrounded by crushing poverty, a Somalian Warlord slaughters his neighbors and buys drugs for his henchmen.

These are not isolated events, they're not outliers off the curve, they're not exceptions to the rule. They are the rule. When we as a species climbed down from the trees and decided to generate what we call human history, we didn't do it by forming committees and drawing up budget proposals, we did it by inventing better ways to kill everyone else. The human urge to destroy, the instinct to take by force what others have gained by labor is part of our genetic makeup. Should anyone doubt this, or claim that "only humans make war," I recommend researching the Four-Year War at Gombe.

Violence and brutality are as much a part of humanity as intelligence and socialization. It is the universal drive of civilization to contain these instincts, to redirect them into more productive channels, to convince people to live within a set of rules. But no matter how civilized, no society has eliminated them, nor will one. The society that forgets this is the society that falls to the barbarian hordes. The society that accepts this, and nurtures the warrior spirit away from barbarism and into the defense of the right is the society that rises to glory.

This is something the Founding Fathers knew well, and it is the reason they wrote "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state," into the Second Amendment. Their perception, their genius, was that an armed population, ready and willing to fight for their freedoms, was the only sure defense against the barbarians. And their wisdom proved to be still relevant nearly two hundred years later, when Admiral Yamamoto told Prime Minister Tojo, "You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass."

But this vision has worked so well that it has been all but forgotten. We have become so complacent in our security that we have forgotten what provides it. We have collectively bought into the notion that someone else should protect us, that the government's job is to provide security. We have forgotten that we are the government - by the people - and that no one will protect us but us - for the people. This has been easy to do, because we are unthreatened. There are no unexplored continents teeming with barbarians ready to invade. We have developed a civilization so adept at wielding military might that none dare invade, for fear of being utterly annihilated. We have done this by concentrating authority over and responsibility for the mechanisms of violence in a comparatively small group of people, who decide when and where we should employ them, and it has proven to be effective.

Surely this means we are safe! The barbarians will not attack, they cannot attack, because the certainty of retribution, swift, sure, and complete, must dissuade any nation from designs upon our sovereignty. The barbarians have been cowed, and we march bravely into the future. For the first time in human history, there are no barbarians at the gates!

Indeed, there are no barbarians at the gates - the barbarians are through the gates and within the walls. They fly planes into skyscrapers in New York, they detonate bombs beneath day care centers in Oklahoma City, they execute students in Columbine.

So let's talk about needs. This is what I need.

I need to protect my children from harm. I need to stop my front lawn from being a killing field. I need to be safe when I walk out my front door. The government does its part to achieve these things: the Mongol Horde isn't going to come screaming down Main Street stealing my children for slaves. No Zeroes will be strafing my front lawn. The Wehrmacht isn't going to goose-step up the walk and bayonet me when I go to work. But I need to do my part, because no one else can do it for me. No amount of governmental good intention will prevent a man from assaulting me in an alley. No division of infantry will stop a thug from raping my wife. No intelligence satellite will catch the man who murders my child before it happens.

What I want is to never be necessary. I devoutly hope to never see true violence, and I have so far managed to avoid even bar fights. I want to be the absolute last line of defense for me and mine, behind every person my tax money has hired to keep my community safe. But no amount of wanting will mean that I am not that last line of defense, and I need, I deserve, I demand the right to be that last line. This is the final remaining vestige of the barbarian impulse, the warrior spirit, that I possess.

And it is this remnant of a racial history steeped in violence that they are trying to crush when they ask why I need guns. It is the warrior spirit that, whether intentionally or not, they are trying to wish out of existence, because it is the warrior spirit, the barbarian urge, that causes violent crime, terrorism, and war. But they are trying to quash it amongst the wrong people, amongst the very people civilization must nurture the most: those who have it, but control it. Those who wield that very drive in defense of those who hope to not need them to.

These people are the most precious resource we have, the cultivated warrior spirit our most important defense. Because it is these people, with this spirit that, in the final extreme, define greatness. These are the people who fling themselves into an angry sea to pull other people's children to safety. These are the people who pit a pistol against a rifle, because they cannot stand by and watch innocent people slaughtered. These are the people who drive their plane into the ground before seeing it used as a weapon of terror.

These are the people society needs, the people society must cultivate, because, ultimately, they are what divides us from, and what protects us against, the barbarians.

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
--George Orwell

Joe Schmoe
04-27-2005, 03:05 PM
Agree with it completely. :) Very right wing when it comes to this issue. Didn't Chicago only get worse with strict gun control?

MikeKAY
04-27-2005, 03:20 PM
Agree with it completely. :) Very right wing when it comes to this issue. Didn't Chicago only get worse with strict gun control?

Yes Chicago did, as did most other major US cites with rabid gun control.

Glad to see you agree, hero. :)

Sable Phoenix
05-18-2005, 05:10 PM
This is a brilliant essay, especially once you reach the last few paragraphs.

A man has a need to be a warrior. It's encoded into him on a spiritual level; the need to know, when the time comes to face down the evil at the threshold, that he has what it takes to wrestle with the evil and come out on top, the need to know that he can fulfill his role as the protector and defender of those he cares for, that he has the ability to keep them safe even at the cost of his own life. The will to resist and to stand for something is ingrained in our nature. Why are stories of the knight in shining armor slaying the dragon and winning the fair maiden's hand favorites of children and even adults for hundreds and thousands of years? They reflect universal human truths and resonate with something in the soul.

(Joseph Campbell has a lot to say on this, but that is a whole different discussion.)

Today's society isn't comfortable with this. Things like the feminist movement and political correctness, the writings of people like Freud and Jung, a couple hundred years of philosophy, and myriad other factors have all funnelled into a collective fabrication of a template for the "kinder, gentler" man. Being a warrior isn't "nice" and is frowned upon. Society would prefer to emasculate him rather than accept him. And so we get deadbeat dads, men who drink themselves into nothingness, crime and violence... you'll notice that the vast majority of violent crime comes from men. I don't think most men could explain why this is so, but it's something we all feel. It's the need to be strong and powerful, to be a warrior, and it's misdirected and misused and turned into barbarism. There's a fear that goes hand in hand with that warrior's desire, the fear that he won't have what it takes. When society insists on telling him he never will have what it takes and, moreover, isn't supposed to, great harm is done.

Well, that was something of a tangent, wasn't it? Anyway. Gun control is just another symptom of this, a high-visibility issue overlaying the true problem. It's not cutting at the root of the problem; it is in fact nurturing the problem and making it worse by removing a tool that can be used to control it.

Magna Harrier
05-18-2005, 07:37 PM
On one hand, I'm all for gun control, because I'm failrly left wing on the issue. On the other hand, there are too many people in the world as is, and they need some way to trim down the numbers. Far be it from me to make it any harder on population control. :P